[FLCrosstrekker]

Thank you, jg. Let the clutching of pearls cease. :eusa_clap:

 

[troutbum]

Aww Just when it was getting interesting.....

:sFun_rofl:

 

[AstroKats]

"A programming issue may lead to inaccuracies between what is shown on the multi-information display, with regards to the amount of fuel left, and the actual drivable distance left."

:sFun_rofl:

 

[rohicks]

I got a letter in the mail from Subaru the other day stating they were extending the warranty on my transmission free of charge to 100k and I suspect it is due to this issue.

Did no one else get that letter?

 

[Okie Hick]

"A programming issue may lead to inaccuracies between what is shown on the multi-information display, with regards to the amount of fuel left, and the actual drivable distance left."

OMG! PLEASE TELL ME THIS ISN'T TRUE!!!!! :eusa_clap:

 

[Dougjc]

I got a letter in the mail from Subaru the other day stating they were extending the warranty on my transmission free of charge to 100k and I suspect it is due to this issue.

Did no one else get that letter?

I recommend you read this thread, your letter & the recall notice in the news.

 

[VSurfn]

May 7, 2013 is when a revised valve train was implemented. See TSB-02-146-13

 

[CrossCanada]

Recall of vehicles with affected multi-information displays
At the same time, Subaru has also announced a recall of the 2018MY Legacy/Outback vehicles, manufactured before 1 August 2018, for potential issues with multi-information displays.

A programming issue may lead to inaccuracies between what is shown on the multi-information display, with regards to the amount of fuel left, and the actual drivable distance left. Subaru is taking a precautionary measure to ensure that information on the fuel gauge and the amount of drivable distance left is accurate.

Phew, its those model, then i can stay tranquil when my Crosstreck is telling me I can do 370km with 1/4 of a tank

 

[artosa]

Does this mean the Exaggeromter is going to be reset to accurately reflect actual mpg's? What are we going to complain about then, geesh! :shocked:

artosa

 

[TwoTone]

Guys, you two both need to let it go.

Sorry didn't care for the attack and responded. Should know better to be lead into it by a troll.

 

[stupidchicken03]

This thread got derailed real quick.

 

[Montanan]

This thread got derailed real quick.

Shocking, isn't it? I'm sure that's the first time that's ever happened in any auto forum, ever.

 

[Okie Hick]

This thread got derailed real quick.

I was rather enjoying it! Speculation can be fun and in some instances value-added in a discussion. It's always interesting to see where the mind can go....

Does this mean the Exaggeromter is going to be reset to accurately reflect actual mpg's? What are we going to complain about then, geesh!

Let's not forget about the novice CVT users! We'll always be hearing from them!

 

[Okie Hick]

I now have to turn my attention to our MY14 Outback which we purchased in September 2013. If its ID plate shows a manufacture date of 14 May 2013 or earlier, we're in for the spring recall. My wife has the car at her school where she teaches. I can hardly wait 'till she gets home to check it out.

Now I'm headed to the Outback forum to see what kind of panic is going on there.

<yes I know I'm kinda off topic here since it's not about the Trek>

UPDATE: Yeah they're in a panic. They have the same info as we.

 

[artosa]

...and if they reset the Exaggerometer, what about the CAFE standards the telemetry is reporting to SOA? Is a "can of worms" about to be opened? :shocked: :smileyvault-stop:

artosa

 

[Okie Hick]

...and if they reset the Exaggerometer, what about the CAFE standards the telemetry is reporting to SOA? Is a "can of worms" about to be opened? :shocked: :smileyvault-stop:

artosa

I hope that they would be smarter than to use a car's onboard computer for any official data.

 

[stupidchicken03]

Shocking, isn't it? I'm sure that's the first time that's ever happened in any auto forum, ever.

:trolling-rage-smile

 

[CRAZYHAWK]

This is on Torque News;

Subaru XV

The Subaru XV 2.0i (XV Crosstrek) models being recalled are manufactured between January 17, 2012, through June 6, 2013 (33,062 units).

 

[rlouie]

Here's another article on the issue from Fortune - Toyota, Subaru Auto Recall For Faulty Airbags, Valve Springs | Fortune

Automakers Subaru and Toyota Motor Corp. are recalling more than 400,000 vehicles because of a valve spring problem that could stall engines and heighten the risk of accidents.
Subaru models including the Forester, Impreza, and BRZ, manufactured between January 2012 and September 2013, are included in the recall. Also included are the Subaru-manufactured Toyota 86 sports cars, called the Scion FR-S during the years included in the recall, according to Newsweek.
Valve springs keep engine valves closed during the fuel combustion process. Subaru has said repairs on the valves could take over 12 hours per vehicle.

The interesting thing that is being thrown around is the magically number of 12 hours for a repair per vehicle. This is no simple repair. I suspect since this recall will cover basically many of the same cars that were covered by the oil consumption TSB, Subaru may just do the smart thing and do a short block replacement for any car that hasn't had any work done for the TSB - ie kill two birds with one stone. After all, it may be cheaper for Subaru to do so as many of the service departments out there already know how to do a short block replacement and if they can take care of both issues in one shorter service call, it may well be worth it.

 

[Okie Hick]

The interesting thing that is being thrown around is the magically number of 12 hours for a repair per vehicle. This is no simple repair.

So the rework itself goes beyond simply pulling the valve covers off to access the springs with the engine still in its bay. I bet that 80% of the labor will be in removing and reinstalling the engine....:tongue: