Subaru Crosstrek and XV Forums banner

Crosstrek vs Maverick

15K views 80 replies 21 participants last post by  Montanan  
#1 ·
So it's time for me to get a new vehicle. The 2 I've narrowed it down to in my price range is the Crosstrek manual and new Maverick Hybrid.

Yes I know 2 very different vehicles. Yes I know stock is limited on both and it will be a while before I get either. Pros for the Maverick is significantly better MPG and it's a truck. Crosstrek is the manual transmission and AWD.

Big thing for me is heated seats. Manual Crosstrek Premium is actually cheaper than the Maverick XLT with the correct package to include heated seats.

To get an AWD Maverick would be significantly more expensive than a Crosstrek.

Anyone with the Crosstrek get one and just feel it was the completely wrong vehicle for them? Or maybe it ended up having options you found you really missed?

I know neither will be a rocketship but coming from a stock 95 Ram diesel either will feel like a top fuel dragster!
 
#9 ·
Anyone with the Crosstrek get one and just feel it was the completely wrong vehicle for them? Or maybe it ended up having options you found you really missed?
It happens. Unless you're rich enough to change over vehicles whenever you want, you really need to make sure you are buying the one which is right for you. Because it can be really expensive lesson to buy a car that ends up not working for you. You should wait until you can actually try both. But in the meantime research the hell out of both and really think about what you'll be needing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Graphite and Sarang
#12 ·
So it's time for me to get a new vehicle. The 2 I've narrowed it down to in my price range is the Crosstrek manual and new Maverick Hybrid.
This is what you REALLY want. So get yourself that manual Crosstrek and a sawzall and maverickitize it.

Image
 
#13 ·
This rendition looks like a two-seat short-bed Subaru Baja.
My 2004 Baja Turbo served my purposes for the 13 years that I owned it. She had a lockable fiberglass bed cover that kept its contents relatively dry and secure. I only got rid of it because I wanted the updated electronic conveniences in my 2020 Crosstrek Limited.
 
#22 ·
I sat in a Santa Cruz not too long ago, I really like a manual myself but if you are going to go auto at least this has a double clutch auto, it also has a turbo version. Reminded me a lot of the Brats we use to have. We will be replacing our 2013 OB at some point and I did consider one of them but in the end we'll most likely get another OB.
 
#27 ·
Back on topic. Comparing these vehicles is really comparing apples to cheese steaks.

This one is pretty simple. What do you want your vehicle to do? If you think you will be hauling dirt and other filthy, smelly junk that you don't want in a closed vehicle, go for the Maverick. If you will be transporting a lot of stuff you want protected from the elements, go for the Crosstrek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sas-XV
#29 ·
Hey, wait! Isn't it my job to coax people back on topic?? :p
The Administrators union is already on my case, LOL!

But yeah, I think there are a couple more variables than that. For me, a big one is that the OP is comparing a 2WD Maverick against an AWD Subaru. AWD is going to win every time there, especially full-time AWD like Subaru's.
That depends. As I said, what will this vehicle be used for? If you will never drive where there is frozen precipitation and will never go off road, do you really need AWD?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobNH
#42 ·
I too was looking at a Crosstrek 6MT or a Maverick AWD. I decided on the Crosstrek for a couple reasons. First is that the AWD system is a constant 50/50 split. Second is that I would need to buy a bed cover for the Maverick to keep anything I haul around dry and safe. Third is the higher price of the Maverick model that I would spec out. Glad I am not the only one that was in this conundrum.
 
#55 ·
Not that this will matter with either for a while.. But I love how simple Subaru's are to work on. You can remove the engine with basically 3 wrenches. Everything is accessible. From what I've seen of modern Fords, they are the complete opposite. Making everything harder to work on. Hell, to change the battery on an escape you have to remove the windshield cowl, wipers, and a few other things. It takes an hour to change. And they probably still haven't fixed their weak threads in their spark plug holes. Fords a big nah from me.
 
#71 · (Edited)
  • Like
Reactions: AstroKats
#75 · (Edited)
#79 ·
lol ... before my time, too, but at least this discussion is making me feel old! ;)

When I was a kid my grandfather still drove an old 1956 Caddy with big tail fins -- one of them was actually hinged, and you had to lift up the fin to access the gas cap underneath. I thought that car was the coolest thing ever, and it's probably left me jaded for every vehicle I've seen since.
 
#80 · (Edited)
lol ... before my time, too, but at least this discussion is making me feel old! ;)

When I was a kid my grandfather still drove an old 1956 Caddy with big tail fins -- one of them was actually hinged, and you had to lift up the fin to access the gas cap underneath. I thought that car was the coolest thing ever, and it's probably left me jaded for every vehicle I've seen since.
The earliest car I remember in our family was a 1961 Buick Invicta:

File:Buick Invicta Convertible 1961.jpg - Wikipedia

File:BuickInvicta-rear.jpg - Wikipedia

It had the same bullet front as the same vintage T-bird which I thought was cool:

File:1963 Thunderbird (14382613191).jpg - Wikipedia