Subaru Crosstrek and XV Forums banner

Test drove Crosstrek Sport & Mazda CX-30

1 reading
25K views 47 replies 28 participants last post by  PDawg  
#1 ·
I currently have a 2018 Crosstrek Limited and the lease will be up soon. It is a second car and used by both me and my college age son. It is also the go anywhere car (well not long drives) when wanting something smaller and more nimble to drive. The main negatives are lack of power, CVT harshness when accelerating, and the quality of the plastics. My car has also been reliable with the only issue over the past 3 years being glitches with the entertainment system freezing up (which hopefully has been reconciled).

I test drove a Mazda CX-30 Premium yesterday and came away impressed. I like the car looks and the interior is so nice. The seats are very comfortable and the whole interior looks more upscale. Rear visibility isn't the greatest, probably being the main negative. In terms of driving, the ride was very refined & quiet with a slightly firmer ride than the Crosstrek. Acceleration was better than my car, but it didn't feel fast, just adequate.

I then drove a Crosstrek Sport today. The 2.5 engine made such a huge difference. The car was noticeably quicker than my 2018 all the way up to highway speeds. The CVT was also not creating a racket. I don't know if the CVT is different in this model, there was more care with quieting noises and vibrations, or a combination of both. The difference was not subtle. The car also felt quicker than the CX-30 in part because it feels stronger from a start, albeit I think the CX-30 posts faster times. In terms of handling, it seemed very similar to my car, but with a bit less body roll and a slightly smoother ride. The ride improvement may be the 17 wheels on the Sport vs the 18's on my car.

Overall, I came away impressed. I think I could be happy with either Crosstrek Sport or the Mazda CX-30, albeit I will likely stay with Subaru. I do wish the Crosstrek's interior was nicer, though.
 
Discussion starter · #19 ·
So I posted because I walked away impressed with the 2.5L engine, finding it was such a noticeable upgrade from my Crosstrek. I was also hoping for commentary on the CX-30 which is a really nice car, and certainly the most comparable IMO to the Crosstrek. I was a bit taken back by the degrading comments when others don't agree on either the acceleration or that there can possible be things people don't like in the Crosstrek. It certainly stifles conversations as well as the people who look when they are buying and opt not to participate.

For some, the 2.0L is fine. For me, I think it is the biggest weakness in my car. While fine for most drives, it is not a car I will take to upstate NY or PA. The car is a slug on the hills, especially if the car is packed. It is also no fun when trying to get on a limited access highway with stop signs at the end of the ramp such as the Merritt Parkway. Also note, that is also the one area where the Mazda CX-30 felt just as slow and one area where you really want to accelerate. The 2.5L just feels better, and as I said previously, feels faster than the CX-30 because it feels quicker off the line. The 2.5L also makes the car feel more refined because it quieter and the CVT isn't whirling as much.

I still wish the Crosstrek's interior was nicer. There are a lot of hard plastics and they just don't look that great compared with the Mazda. I do like the Sport seats. They feel plusher and more comfortable than my Limited's leather which I find very firm. I am still considering the Mazda, but am leaning towards the Sport. I may considered the CX-30 Turbo, but I am not sure I want the added complexity since there is more than a 50% chance this car will become my son's when he finally graduates.

Image