Now I do acuse you. You are clearly trying to wiggle out of responsibility by blaming other companies for your actions. You either stand by your products or you don't, you dont. I'd never buy another product from you, & would always try to convince others not to. You intentionally mislead people, and dont try that "interpreted" baloney. You may have walked the legal tightrope, but you've blown your reputation in the process. You made a good buck tricking consumers, now I hope your company fails. I'll be sure to make sure other forums I use are aware of you giving your customers the finger.You are correct. "Street legal output" is a marketing term, referring to the beam pattern itself. We took the idea from other, much larger companies, who used the same type of terminology in describing the output of their products. However, even though the output pattern is correct, the bulbs are not fully compliant, due to marking and geometric requirements. We did not advertise them as DOT compliant, though I understand how "street legal output" may be interpreted that way. I apologize for any confusion on terminology. Thanks!